Legal Opinion

Vehicle Development Corp. Pty Ltd. v. Livernois Vehicle Development, LLC

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided February 3, 2014No. Civil Case No. 13-14090Published

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

TERRENCE G. BERG, District Judge.

This is a claim and delivery action, in which Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants Vehicle Development Corporation PTY LTD (‘VDC Aust”) and Vehicle Development Corporation PTE LTD (“VDC Sing”) (collectively, “VDC” or “Plaintiffs”)1 seek possession of 81 Ford F550 trucks (the “Trucks”) from Defendant Livernois Vehicle Development, LLC (“Livernois”). Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Comerica Bank (“Comerica”) intervened in this lawsuit, as a secured creditor of Livernois (Dkt. 10). The question presented is whether the Trucks should be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Bristol Associates, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Girard Trust BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. Morton Booth Co. v. Tiara Furniture, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Ensink v. Mecosta County General HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Kinetics Technology International Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. The Fourth National Bank of Tulsa, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
  5. State Bank of Young America v. Vidmar Iron Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API