Legal Opinion

Kinnear v. Flanders

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

JSrror to County Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Helm

Kinnear brought suit before a justice of the peace against one Brunell to recover $258.24. The jurisdiction of the justice over the original subject-matter is therefore unquestioned. A writ of attachment in aid was issued and certain property-levied upon thereunder. Flanders, a disinterested third party, intervened in pursuance of the statute claiming ownership of the property attached.

The justice lipón trial dismissed the plea of intervention. Fie also entered judgment in favor of Kinnear against Brunell for the amount claimed sustaining likewise the attachment proceeding. Thereupon Flanders…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mazange v. SlocumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1853
  2. Kent v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  3. Bradstreet Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Thornily v. PierceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887
  5. Denver, Western & Pacific R'y Co. v. ChurchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Corthell v. MeadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
  2. Clendenning v. GuiseWyoming Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Montgomery v. KirkseyArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Carter v. BunigerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1943
  5. Hennessey v. ReedColorado Court of Appeals · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API