Bradstreet Co. v. Higgins
Supreme Court of the United States
IN ERROR TO THE CIEOUIT COUET OE THE UNITED STATES EOE THE. WESTERN DISTRICT OE MISSOUBI. This case having been dismissed for want of jurisdiction, the defendant in error made' the following application to the court. “ The plaintiff in'error failing to print the record, the requisite amount was advanced by the defendant in' error, with the' understanding that in case of his success this would be refunded.
Read the full summary
IN ERROR TO THE CIEOUIT COUET OE THE UNITED STATES EOE THE. WESTERN DISTRICT OE MISSOUBI. This case having been dismissed for want of jurisdiction, the defendant in error made' the following application to the court. “ The plaintiff in'error failing to print the record, the requisite amount was advanced by the defendant in' error, with the' understanding that in case of his success this would be refunded. “The Clerk now informs the defendant in error, that the amount advanced by him cannot be taxed in his favor, nor any of his other costs in this court, because the cause was dismissed for…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite
This writ of error was dismissed at a former day in .this term, on motion of the defendant in error, for want of jurisdiction, because the value of the matter in dispute did not exceed $5,000. 112 IT. S. 227. In order to present his motion to dismiss, it became necessary for the, defendant in error to cause, the record to be printed, and to do that he was' compelled to pay the cost'.of printing and the fee of the qlerk for supervising. The judgment, as entered on the motion to dismiss, made no order as to costs, and the defendant in error now moves that the cost of printing and the clerk’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Montalet v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1807
- Hornthall v. CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Inglee v. CoolidgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- Turner v. EnrilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1799
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reynolds v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Tug River, Coal & Salt Co. v. BrigelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
- Bice v. Boothsville Telephone Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
- Walko v. WalkoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Kent v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.