Legal Opinion

Pries v. City of Antioch

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 10, 2023No. 3:21-cv-04890Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 CODY PRIES, 11 Plaintiff, No. C 21-04890 WHA 12 v. 13 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, PAUL ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS MANAUT, ELIZABETH 14 HOLLANDBERRY, and DOES 1–50, 15 Defendants. 16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 In this Section 1983 action, plaintiff asserts that defendants violated the federal 19 constitution and California statutes by denying him medical care while he was in custody. 20 Defendants move to dismiss. For the reasons that follow, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN 21 PART AND DENIED IN PART. 22 STATEMENT 23…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API