Legal Opinion
Vardjan v. Esperdy
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 18, 1961PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVET, District Judge.
Defendant originally moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Rule 12(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. An order was sought dismissing the instant complaint on the ground that it failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted and that the defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. In connection with this motion, defendant submitted plaintiff’s administrative file in the Immigration and Naturalization Service (Exhibit A) containing the record of the proceedings held pursuant to Section 243 (h) of the Immigration and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Marcello v. BondsSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Shaughnessy v. PedreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Jay v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States Ex Rel. Dolenz v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Florentino A. Zamora v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Roberte Noel v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- Joseph Muskardin v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Chen Chaun-Fa v. KileyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Floriana Vardjan v. P. A. Esperdy, as District Director of the New York District of the Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962