Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 11, 1922No. 10599PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Superior Court, Tulsa County; M. A. Breckenridge, Judge. Action by Ruth Johnson and others against Willie L. Hudson and others for recovery of land, etc. Judgment for plaintiffs, anil defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.

This action was instituted by the defendants in error, plaintiffs below, against the plaintiffs in error, defendants below, to recover the possession of certain land in Tulsa county, for rents and profits thereon, and for the cancellation of certain deeds thereto.

The material allegations of (he petition are, in substance, that the plaintiff Ruth Johnson was a half-blood citizen of the Creek Nation; that the land in controversy was her surplus allotment; that on the 25th day of January, 1905, she executed and delivered to Burrell C. Hudson a warranty deed purporting to convey said land to him…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Johnston v. BurnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sand Springs Railway Co. v. WesthaferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API