People Ex Rel. Leidner v. DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF GARFIELD
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Carrigan
The Garfield County district attorney filed this original proceeding seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus under C.A.R. 21. We issued a rule to show cause why the respondent district court should not be ordered to reinstate two counts of felony theft against the defendant in the underlying criminal case. The district court, after a preliminary hearing, had dismissed those charges for lack of probable cause. We conclude that the district judge did not abuse his discretion or act beyond his jurisdiction 1 and, therefore, we discharge the rule.
The defendant was office manager and bookkeeper…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hunter v. District Ct. in & for Twentieth Jud. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- People v. TreatSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
- Maestas v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- City of Colorado Springs v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Thies v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. HrapskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- Abbott v. County Court of the Fourteenth Judicial District in & for the County of GrandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- White v. MacFarlaneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- People v. LuttrellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.