Haag v. Castro
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Justice.
Players on a local youth soccer team seek to recover under the state youth soccer governing association’s business auto-insurance policy for injuries sustained when the van in which they were riding was involved in an accident. Because the van was not being used in the business of the association, a condition for coverage under the insurance policy at issue, the injured players may not recover.
Background
The plaintiffs in this case were players (or parents of players) on a soccer team called Carmel Commotion. Carmel Commotion was one of a number of teams fielded by the Carmel…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Beam v. Wausau Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Wagner v. YatesIndiana Supreme Court · 2009
- Amerisure, Inc. v. Wurster Const. Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2004
- Hartford Insurance Company of the Southeast v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Meridian Mutual Insurance Co. v. RichieIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Howard Justice v. American Family Insurance CompanyIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Empire Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Charlene Frierson and Roderick FriersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. C.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022
- GRINNELL MUTUAL REINSURANCE COMPANY v. LONGDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2022
- Haag v. CastroIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.