Legal Opinion
Loughman v. Couchman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided May 6, 1952No. 48044PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGaReield, J.
After our decision in Loughman v. Couchman, 242 Iowa 885, 47 N.W.2d 152, plaintiff, Mrs. Loughman, petitioned -the district court for a new trial on the ground of “Material evidence, newly discovered, which could not with reasonable diligence have been discovered and produced at the trial * * >*” as provided by rule 252(f), R. C. P. The court heard the newly discovered evidence from the new witness and testimony of (wo1 of plaintiff’s attorneys upon the issue of reasonable diligence and granted the new trial. Defendants have appealed from such order pursuant to rule 331(a), R. C. P., as…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- American Bank Note Co. v. New York Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Lawson v. FordyceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Romans v. NadlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- A.B.N. Co. v. . N.Y.E.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Riemers v. City of Grand ForksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. CompianoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- Groves v. GrovesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Krieg v. GrantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
- Des Moines Bank & Trust Co. Ex Rel. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- Webb v. ArterburnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.