Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marshall v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 24, 2012No. 103Published

1Dissent

BELL, C.J.,

dissenting, in which GREENE, J., joins.

The majority holds that “meaningful trial proceedings” have begun whenever a venire panel has been summoned, has entered the courtroom and been addressed, however preliminarily, by the trial judge. Op. at 364-66, 51 A.3d at 641-42 (2012). In this case, after some preliminary matters had been disposed of, a venire panel was summoned to the courtroom. After the panel members entered the courtroom, the trial judge greeted them, but, before he could introduce himself, he was interrupted by the petitioner’s request to represent himself. Op. at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Don Garriga Chapman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Raphael PlattnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964
  4. Dingle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API