Legal Opinion
Alevras v. Tacopina
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided November 23, 2005No. CIV.03-3780 WHWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLS, District Judge.
Defendants Joseph Tacopina (“Tacopina”), Tama Beth Kudman (“Kudman”), and Joseph Benfante (“Benfante”) (collectively, “Defendants”) move for (i) an order granting summary judgment and (ii) an order dismissing plaintiff Chris Alevras’ (“Alevras”) complaint for failure to state a claim. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 78, the motion is decided without oral argument. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is granted.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This action arises out of Alevras’ dissatisfaction with the legal representation provided to him by Defendants during…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alevras v. TacopinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Marrero v. FeintuchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- KOURANI v. DENBEAUXDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025