Legal Opinion

Arthur v. Nyquist

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided August 21, 1981No. Civ-1972-325PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURTIN, Chief Judge.

In April of 1976, this court held that the Buffalo Board of Education and the City of Buffalo were guilty of intentional racial segregation of the Buffalo Public School System [BPSS]. The court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are fully reported in Arthur v. Nyquist, 415 F.Supp. 904 (W.D.N.Y.1976), aff’d 573 F.2d 134 (2d Cir. 1978), cert. denied Manch v. Arthur, 439 U.S. 860, 99 S.Ct. 179, 58 L.Ed.2d 169 (1978). Numerous decisions have followed the original liability finding in an attempt to fashion a comprehensive and acceptable remedy. These decisions include my…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Arthur v. NyquistCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Arthur v. NyquistDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1982
  3. Arthur v. NyquistCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Pride Communications Ltd. Partnership v. WCKG, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
  5. Glass City Black Bros. United v. NeebDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API