Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Commonwealth v. Dorian

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 1983No. 890Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJohnson, Judge

I join parts 1 and 4 of the majority opinion, finding that the trial court did not lack jurisdiction to accept appellant’s guilty plea, and finding no support for appellant’s argument concerning ineffective assistance of counsel. I also concur in the result reached by the majority in Part 2 as to the denial of the pre-sentence motion to withdraw guilty plea. As to the issue relating to the illegality of appellant's sentence, I am compelled to register my dissent.

With respect to the illegality of appellant’s sentence, the majority holds as follows: *253At 249-250 (footnotes 4 and 5 omitted). I…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Haun v. CavellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Salerno v. BanmillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Commonwealth v. DraperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Matthews v. LomasSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. ReeseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API