Legal Opinion

Murray Oil Products, Inc. v. Royal Exchange Assurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 11, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*840Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Capozzoli and Rabin, JJ.; McNally, J., dissents in the following memorandum: The judgment herein should be affirmed. The action is on a policy of insurance issued by defendant to plaintiff’s warehouseman, Harbor Tank Storage Co., Inc. (Harbor). The original issue was for the period December 31, 1961, to December 31, 1962. It was renewed for the following year. Its coverage is “ against physical loss * * * arising from, through, or in connection with the Assured’s legal liability, as warehouseman, or bailees * * * in respect of oils and similar commodities the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stecker v. American Home Fire Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Lewis v. Home InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  3. Lewis v. . Home Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Soltex Polymer Corp. v. Fortex Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1984
  2. Wometco Home Theatre, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Ressler v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  4. Ressler v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API