ABAR Associates v. Luna
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTTELL, Justice.
This appeal requires us to revisit the right of redemption foreclosure process under Rhode Island’s tax sale statute. It is a familiar journey, and one which we have made with increasing frequency of late. .
The plaintiff, ABAR Associates, appeals from a Superior Court order that vacated a final decree forever foreclosing and barring all rights of redemption and that al*991lowed First Union National Bank (First Union) to redeem a parcel of real estate that ABAR had purchased at a tax auction sale.
We have addressed various aspects of Rhode Island’s tax sale statute on many…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marshall v. VicksburgSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Albertson v. LecaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
- Picerne v. SylvestreSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- Picerne v. SylvestreSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
- Kildeer Realty v. Brewster Realty Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Federal National Mortgage Association v. Etta E. MalinouSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
- John Izzo v. Victor RealtySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
- Pleasant Management, LLC v. CarrascoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Jeanne E. Johnson v. QBAR AssociatesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013
- Medeiros v. Bankers Trust Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.