Legal Opinion
Van Zee v. Hanson
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 18, 2011No. 10-1588PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENTON, Circuit Judge.
Joseph S. Van Zee sued Marilyn Hanson under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that she violated his Fourteenth Amendment rights by disclosing his juvenile records to an Army recruiter. The district court 1 dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Van Zee v. Hanson, No. CIV. 09-3007, 2010 WL 653430, at *3 (D.S.D. Feb.22, 2010). This court affirms.
Van Zee enlisted in the Army in early 2008. In June, his recruiter advised him that he could begin basic training after completion of a background check. Van Zee then executed two blank…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Town of Castle Rock v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Gregory v. Dillard's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Schmidt v. City of Bella VillaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Bjc Health System v. Columbia Casualty Company, Doing Business as Cna HealthproCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- Ginsburg v. INBEV NV/SACourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Zach Hillesheim v. Myron's Cards and Gifts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Brooks v. Midwest Heart GroupCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Novotny v. Tripp County, SDCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Burlison Ex Rel. CM v. Springfield Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Bass v. Anoka CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.