United States v. Haney
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
John Lee Haney was convicted of possessing two maehineguns in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o). On appeal, he asserts that § 922(o) violates the Second Amendment and the Commerce Clause. Both arguments are foreclosed by controlling Tenth Circuit precedent. See United States v. Baer, 235 F.3d 561, 564 (10th Cir.2000) (Second Amendment); United States v. Wilks, 58 F.3d 1518, 1521 (10th Cir.1995) (Commerce Clause).
BACKGROUND
The facts of this case are essentially undisputed. John Lee Haney walked into a police station, engaged an officer in conversation, and told him that he…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. DykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- United States v. Rene E.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Michael PetersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Joseph H. FleischliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- United States v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.