Legal Opinion

United States v. Haney

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 29, 2001No. 00-6129PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

John Lee Haney was convicted of possessing two maehineguns in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(o). On appeal, he asserts that § 922(o) violates the Second Amendment and the Commerce Clause. Both arguments are foreclosed by controlling Tenth Circuit precedent. See United States v. Baer, 235 F.3d 561, 564 (10th Cir.2000) (Second Amendment); United States v. Wilks, 58 F.3d 1518, 1521 (10th Cir.1995) (Commerce Clause).

BACKGROUND

The facts of this case are essentially undisputed. John Lee Haney walked into a police station, engaged an officer in conversation, and told him that he…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. People v. DykesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. United States v. Rene E.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. Michael PetersCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Joseph H. FleischliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. PattonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API