Legal Opinion

Jarvis Peele, et al. v. Randy Harris, et al.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 26, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00623Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION JARVIS PEELE, et al. PLAINTIFFS v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:25-CV-623-JHM RANDY HARRIS, et al. DEFENDANTS MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Jarvis Peele and Development Academy Corporation filed the instant pro se civil action invoking this Court’s diversity jurisdiction.1 Because Plaintiff Peele is proceeding in forma pauperis (DN14), the Court must conduct an initial review of the action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) and McGore v. Wrigglesworth,

114 F.3d 601

(6th Cir. 1997), overruled on other grounds by Jones v. Bock,

549…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API