Legal Opinion

Cotton v. Hanover Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 9, 2010PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, P.J.

After a jury-waived trial of this personal-injury protection (“PIP”) action, the trial judge found that Hanover Insurance Company’s (“Hanover”) insured, Stephen J. Cotton (“Cotton”), had failed to attend two scheduled independent medical examinations (“IME”), and that Hanover was not required to prove it was thereby prejudiced in order properly to deny Cotton’s PIP claim. Judgment was entered for Hanover. Cotton filed this appeal, claiming that the trial court erred because Hanover could not prevail without establishing prejudice, which it failed to do. We affirm the judgment.

Cotton’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goodman v. American Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. Hodnett v. Arbella Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  3. Boffoli v. Premier InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  4. Brito v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  5. Knight v. CNA InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Northshore Chiropractic v. Commerce InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API