Courtney v. State
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
REIF, V.C.J.
{1 The primary issue presented in this original proceeding is whether this Court or the Court of Criminal Appeals has jurisdiction to review an order deciding a request to determine actual innocence. A determination of actual innocence is required for a wrongful conviction claim under the Governmental Tort Claims Act, 51 0.8.2011, §§ 151 through 172. The controversy over appellate jurisdiction stems from the fact that petitioner Sedrick Ramon Courtney sought a determination of actual innocence at the conclusion of a post-conviction relief proceeding. This is a criminal proceeding…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Durham v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Wilhoit v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- DUTTON v. CITY OF MIDWEST CITYSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2015
- State of Iowa v. David R. DesimoneSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- GJA v. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
- CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BALKMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY v. BALKMANSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.