Legal Opinion

City of Seattle v. May

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 2011No. 83677-9Published

1Opinion of the Court

256 P.3d 1161 (2011)

171 Wn.2d 847

CITY OF SEATTLE, Respondent,

v.

Robert J. MAY, Petitioner.

No. 83677-9.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Argued October 21, 2011.

Decided June 23, 2011.

Christine Anne Jackson, The Public Defender, Seattle, WA, for Petitioner.

Richard Edward Greene, Seattle City Attorney's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

OWENS, J.

¶ 1 In 2005, Robert May violated a domestic violence protection order that prohibited him from contacting his ex-wife. As a result, May was convicted, under a city of Seattle ordinance, of violating the protection order. May contends that the order…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. State v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Labriola v. Pollard Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. BunkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. BunkerWashington Supreme Court · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API