Legal Opinion
People v. Santana
New York Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 1993PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph G. Golia, J.
On July 10, 1987, a jury, rejecting the defense of not guilty *302by reason of mental disease or defect, convicted Emanuel Santana, at a joint trial, on three counts of forcible rape, robbery, and sexual abuse. Although affirmed by the Appellate Division (172 AD2d 704 [1991]), the Court of Appeals in 1992, set aside the jury’s verdict and the. cases are now before this court on remand. (People v Santana, 80 NY2d 92 [1992].)
In order to establish the defense of lack of responsibility by reason of mental disease or defect, pursuant to Penal Law former § 30.05…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- People v. TarsiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- People v. ModestoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- In re of an Investigation into the Death of Jon L.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Dixon v. ConwayDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995