Legal Opinion
Masterton v. Lenox Realty Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 16, 1940No. (1832)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The plaintiffs, holders of 10 per cent of the stock of the defendant, applied for the appointment of a receiver of the defendant under General Statutes, § 3467, printed in part in the footnote. As is not infrequently the ease, the hearing on the appointment of a temporary receiver was, by stipulation, made a full trial on the merits. Sufficient cause was found and a receiver was appointed. The questions raised by the appeal are: did the plaintiffs properly represent the required 10 per cent of the stock, should an appraisal of the minority interest have been made, is the finding supported by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Transportation Co., Inc. v. ToquetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Massoth v. Central Bus CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Minotte E. Chatfield Co. v. Coffey Laundries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Cogswell v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- American Surety Co. v. Great White Spirit Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Galdi v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Masone v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Bator v. United Sausage Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Martin v. Martin's News Service, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
- Krall v. KrallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.