Legal Opinion

State v. Garlick

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 2, 1988No. 159, September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

We revisit today a question we addressed four years ago in Moon v. State, 300 Md. 354, 478 A.2d 695 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1207, 105 S.Ct. 1170, 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985): Is the constitutional right of confrontation violated by the admission into evidence of a hospital record containing laboratory test results unless the technician who conducted the test is produced as a witness? In Moon, we answered the question in the affirmative. We do not retreat from our holding in Moon, but because of substantial differences between the record in that case and this, we here respond to…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. People v. FackelmanMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Chapman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  4. Department of Public Safety & Correctional Services v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Rollins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API