Legal Opinion
Kostick v. Del Castillo
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 19, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to prohibit the New York City Transit Authority (hereinafter Transit Authority) from conducting a hearing regarding disciplinary charges filed against the petitioner, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated May 7, 1987, which, upon the respondents’ cross motion to dismiss the proceeding due to the petitioner’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies, dismissed the proceeding.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The doctrine of exhaustion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Watergate II Apartments v. Buffalo Sewer AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Steinberg v. Sea Gate Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3Cited by3 opinions
- Priester v. DowlingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Silberman v. BidermanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- Matter of Vineland Commons, LLC v. Building Dept. of Town of RiverheadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018