Legal Opinion

Brinkman v. Succession of Posey

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 7, 1915No. 21368PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Oivil District Court, Parish of Orleans; T. O. W. Ellis, Judge. Petitory action by Ernest M. Brinkman and others^ against the Succession of LloydPosey and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

O’NIELL, J.

The plaintiff, appellee, has moved to dismiss this appeal, and prays, in the alternative, that if it be not dismissed, it be decreed to- be only a devolutive appeal. The reasons urged for demanding that the appeal be dismissed are twofold: (1) That the defendant prayed for and obtained only a suspensive appeal, and filed the appeal bond for only a suspensive appeal after the ten days allowed for filing a suspensive appeal bond had expired and after a motion to have the appeal dismissed and the judgment executed had been filed in the civil district court;…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cockerham v. BosleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
  2. Successions of KellerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  3. Knoll v. KnollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  4. Succession of WattSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  5. Michenor v. ReinachSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Graziani v. Elder & Walters Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  2. Courvelle v. EckartLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
  3. Lewis v. ProvenzanoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. HarrisonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API