Legal Opinion
Knoll v. Knoll
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 13, 1905No. 15,528PublishedCited by 14 opinions
Appeal from CiviJ District Court, Parish of Orleans; Fred D. King, Judge. Action by Edward Knoll against Wilhelmena Knoll. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
On Motion to Dismiss.
PROVOSTY, J.
An order granting an appeal on motion in open court, and duly entered on the minutes, need not be signed by the judge. No law requires it to be signed by the judge, and it is sufficiently authenticated by being entered on the minutes.
Act No. 49, p. 151, of 1871, amends article 573 of the Code of Practice by adding thereto the following:
“But in cases where the judgment decrees a divorce, such petition or motion of appeal must be filed within 30 days not including Sundays, after the signing of such judgment, instead of 10 days, and shall operate as a suspensive…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Successions of KellerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
- Succession of WattSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
- Michenor v. ReinachSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1896
- Weil v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
- Succession of BeySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1895
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Matter of BadgerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- Urbach v. UrbachWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
- Anderson v. ThomasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
- Jacobs v. JacobsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Mollring v. MollringSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.