Legal Opinion

Coclough v. Akal Security, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 13, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2016-2376Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JANICE G. COCLOUGH, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 16-2376 (BAH) ) AKAL SECURITY, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Janice Coclough brings this action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (“Title VII”), see 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), see

D.C. Code § 2-1401

et seq., against her former employer, Akal Security, Inc. (“Akal”) and former supervisors Lois Epps (“Epps”) and Josiah Eaves (“Eaves”). See generally Second Amended…

2Cases cited49 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.