Legal Opinion

Bridgman v. Union Pacific Railroad

Montana Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 2013No. DA 12-0606PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

¶1 Gene Bridgman appeals an order of the First Judicial District Court, Lewis and Clark County, granting summary judgment to Union Pacific Railroad Company on Bridgman’s Federal Employers’ Liability Act (FELA) claim and denying his request for additional discovery. We address the following issues on appeal:

¶2 1. Whether the District Court erred in concluding as a matter of law that Bridgman’s FELA claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations.

¶3 2. Whether the District Court erred in denying Bridgman’s request for additional discovery pursuant to M. R. Civ. P. 56(f).

¶4 We affirm.

P…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Engel v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. David J. Fries v. Chicago & Northwestern Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BNSF RailwayMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Davidson v. BarstadMontana Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Schoof v. NesbitMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Gourneau v. Wolf Point School BoardMontana Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Anderson v. BNSF RailwayMontana Supreme Court · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API