Legal Opinion

Owens v. Ragland

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 12, 2004No. 03-C-369-CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

CRABB, District Judge.

This is a civil action for monetary and injunctive relief, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff Selinda Owens contends that defendant Enis Ragland sexually harassed her in violation of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and then retaliated against her when she complained about it, in violation of the First. Amendment. Jurisdiction is present under 28 U.S.C. § 1331.

Defendant has moved for summary judgment on both of plaintiffs claims. The motion will be denied as to plaintiffs equal protection claim and granted with respect…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Personnel Administrator of Mass. v. FeeneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hutchins v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Thomas v. RaglandDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2004
  3. Cockroft v. MooreDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2009
  4. DeJong v. PembrookDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023
  5. Hutchins v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API