Legal Opinion

State, Avillo v. Zoning Comm., City of Bridgeport

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 17, 1949No. File 79738Published

1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.

An alternative writ of mandamus has issued wherein the basic facts alleged are in substance that the respondent, having first certified that the relator’s premises were so situated that a permit for the sale of liquor might issue in conformity to the zoning law, after a lapse of time revoked that certification upon the ground that, because of nonuser for a specified period, the premises could no longer be used for the sale of liquor.

The motion to quash is equivalent to a demurrer and is to be determined upon the facts alleged in the alternative writ. State ex rel. Campo v. Osborn, 126 Conn.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Middletown Trust Co. v. Middletown National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  2. State Ex Rel. Campo v. OsbornSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  3. Town of West Hartford v. WillettsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  4. State Ex Rel Fense v. City Clerk of HartfordConnecticut Superior Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API