Legal Opinion

Patenaude v. Dick's Sporting Goods Inc

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided October 18, 2019No. 9:18-cv-03151Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT DIVISION Hunter J. Patenaude, ) Civil Action No. 9:18-cv-3151-RMG Plaintiff, V. ORDER AND OPINION Dick’s Sporting Goods, Inc., and Shock Doctor, Inc., ) Defendants. oo) This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Exclude Plaintiff's Expert John Lloyd, Ph.D., CPE (Dkt. No. 43). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the motion. I. Background This is a products liability case arising out an injury sustained by Plaintiff Hunter Patenaude when using a CORE Bioflex athletic cup manufactured by Defendant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. United States v. Mohammad HassanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  4. Synergetics, Inc. v. Charles Richard Hurst, Jr. Michael McGowanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. Branham v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API