Babb v. Cordell Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
The affidavits afford ample support for the court’s findings the defendant was doing business in North Carolina during the years 1952, 1953 and until July, 1954. Although the defendant took numerous exceptions to the findings of fact, it is doubtful whether the assignments of error based thereon are sufficiently specific to call them into question. However, assignment of error No. 3, based on exception No. 45, challenges the conclusions of law, the sufficiency of the findings to support them, and the validity of the order requiring the defendant to answer.
It appears by inference, and was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- McDonald v. MacArthur Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Steele v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. J. B. Hunt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
- Marshville Rendering Corp. v. Gas Heat Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
- United States v. Atlantic Contractors, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1964
- Espin v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2023
- PDII, LLC v. Sky Aircraft Maint., LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2025