Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ewell

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1925No. Docket No. 1243PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Application for a writ of habeas corpus.

Petitioner was adjudged guilty of contempt of court and sentenced to imprisonment in the county jail for a period of twenty-four hours, by the superior court of the state of California in and for the city and county of San Francisco, department 16 thereof, Honorable Louis H. Ward presiding. The return of the sheriff to said writ sets forth a copy of the commitment embodying the judgment of contempt. Incorporated in such judgment are the facts upon which the adjudication of contempt is based. The return, we think, is legally sufficient in form and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex parte Ah MenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. In Re ShortridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Blodgett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State Ex Rel. Giblin v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  4. In Re HallinanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. In Re CunhaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API