Legal Opinion

People v. Ramirez

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 12, 1931No. Docket No. 209PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LAMBERSON, J., pro tem.

Motion to dismiss an appeal upon the ground that the appellant has not complied with the requirements of section 7 of rule II of the Rules of the Judicial Council promulgated for the Supreme Court and District Courts of Appeal, which provides as follows: “Upon an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of conviction or from an order denying his motion for a new trial, or from an order made after judgment, or upon an appeal by the People from an order granting a new trial, or from an order setting aside an indictment, information or accusation, or from an order made…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Touchard v. CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. W. H. Marston Co. v. KochritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. People v. RigaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. People v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Franklin Discount Co. v. FordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. In Re GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. HaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Campbell v. Mason, SheriffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  5. People v. MaldonadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API