Republic of New Morocco v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff, the Republic of New Morocco, alleges that an employee of the United States Department of State (“State Depart ment”) unlawfully refused to authenticate various documents and damaged additional documents. Defendant, contending that plaintiff has failed to identify a money-mandating source of law, moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s motion to dismiss is granted.
I.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- El v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Julio A. Ramos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Davis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Double Lion Uchet Express Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Harmon-El v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.