Legal Opinion
Jernigan v. Alderwoods Group, Inc.
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided May 21, 2007No. Civil 05-1420-PKPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARSH, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak filed his Findings and Recommendation on April 4, 2007. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 686(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of the Magistrate’s Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the Magistrate’s report. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Business Machines, Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920, 102 S.Ct. 1277, 71 L.Ed.2d 461 (1982).
Plaintiffs have…
2Cases cited52 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pearson v. Reynolds School District 7District Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Clark v. Tucson, City ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Dossett v. Ho-Chunk, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2020
- Melissa Fireside v. College for America, Southern New Hampshire UniversityDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018
- Morris v. Asante Health SystemsDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.