Byrnes v. Chase National Bank
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
No appeal having been taken to the Appellate Division from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the complaint as to the defendants Conant and Elliman, the question of the liability of said defendants is not before this court, and they have been erroneously designated as respondents on this appeal.
The judgment of the Appellate Division dismissing the complaint as to the defendants other than Conant and Elliman, should be affirmed with costs.
Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, Kellogg and O’Brien, JJ., concur; Hubbs, J., not sitting.
Judgment accordingly.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Bank of New York Mellon v. CroninAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Brown v. BedellNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Wild v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
- Burgoyne v. JamesNew York Supreme Court · 1935
- Brown v. BedellNew York Supreme Court · 1932