Legal Opinion

United States v. Ventura-Candelario

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 18, 1997No. 92 CR. 583 (MGC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CEDARBAUM, District Judge.

Defendant moves pursuant to Fed. R.Crim.P.. 35(c) for correction of his sentence. Defendant contends that an amendment to the statute under which he was convicted reduces the maximum permissible sentence to two years’ imprisonment. For the reasons that follow, defendant’s motion is denied.

Defendant was convicted of violating 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2). This statute prescribes criminal penalties for illegal reentry into the United States by certain removed aliens. 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

Section 1326(a) provides for a two year term of imprisonment for aliens who…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Brian PantinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  2. NOLASCOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1999
  3. United States v. Ramon Nunez-RodeloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API