Legal Opinion

Sophy Whitman v. Eva Ruth Green, Administratrix of the Estate of Walter Frank Green, Deceased, Etc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 28, 1961No. 17003_1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Circuit Judge.

This diversity action places in issue the proper construction of Idaho’s conflict of laws rule with regard to usury.

Appellant brought suit for judgment upon a promissory note and for foreclosure of a mortgage given as security. The district court ruled, on summary judgment, that under Idaho law the note calling for interest at the rate of twelve per cent per annum was usurious, with the result that twice the total amount of interest was forfeited. In this case a principal balance in the sum of $3,900 was found due. From this twice the amount of interest, or $2,267.06,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vermont Loan & Trust Co. v. HoffmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Zimmerman v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Fidelity Savings Ass'n v. SheaIdaho Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Winters v. SwiftIdaho Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Cornelison v. United States Building & Loan Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Havenfield Corporation v. H & R Block, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  2. Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1982
  3. Stanbury v. LarsenWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Dairy Equipment Co. of Utah v. BoehmeIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API