Legal Opinion
In Re Faust
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina
Decided June 27, 1994No. 19-00910PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WM. THURMOND BISHOP,' Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter is before the Court on debtors’ objection to the proof of claim filed by the United States for priority income tax debts. Debtors contend that the claim should not be allowed because it was filed more than ninety (90) days following the petition date. The United States contends that (1) their formal proof of claim merely amended a timely informal claim and thus, the amended claim should be allowed; (2) the claim should be allowed on equitable grounds; and (3) claims cannot be disallowed under Section 502 of the Bankruptcy Code due to the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hutchinson v. OtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- In Re Coastal Alaska Lines, Inc., Debtor. Zidell, Inc. v. Daniel E. Forsch, Esq., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In the Matter of Robert & Elizabeth Wilkens, Debtors-Appellants v. Simon Brothers, Inc., Creditor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- J. J. Fyne, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of W. H. Calder Company, Inc., Bankrupt v. Atlas Supply CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bowden v. Structured Investments Co. (In Re Bowden)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2004
- In Re GilleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 2002
- In Re Elleco, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · 2002
- In Re NamusyuleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003