Legal Opinion

Veigel ex rel. Ruthton State Bank v. Dakota Trust & Savings Bank

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1929No. File No. 6616PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

As security for a loan, Dakota Trust & Savings Bank took 63 shares of'the capital stock of Ruthton State Bank, of Ruthton, Minn., and, default being made in payment of the loan, the security was foreclosed on or about April 22, 1922, and the bank became the owner of the stock, which was bid in in the name *239of its cashier. Soon thereafter a 50 per cent assessment was levied on the stock, which the bank paid. It 'does not appear that it ever received any dividend on the stock. On September 25, 1923, it purchased 14 additional shares of the stock of the Ruthton bank. This purchase was. made…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. National Bank v. CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. First Nat. Bank of Ottawa v. ConverseSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  3. Byington v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
  4. Northwestern Trust Co. v. BradburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. Houghton v. HubbellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fluth v. Schoenfelder Constr., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Smith v. SognSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API