Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sogn

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 1929No. File No. 6604PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MISER, C.

This is an action under section 8937, Rev. Code 1919, to enforce an alleged stockholder’s liability under section *4928993, Rev. Code 1919. The sole question is whether respondent was -liable as a stockholder of the bank of which appellant later took charge as superintendent of banks. The trial court, which had the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses, found that respondent never was a stockholder. In the light of this finding, the facts may be stated thus: On June 19., 1922, one Graslie, formerly cashier of the bank, sold his interest in the bank to A. M. -Sogn, its…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Keyser v. HitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Scott v. DeweeseSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Williams v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. Blackert v. LankfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Farmers' State Bank v. EmpeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Andrew v. First Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  2. McGehee v. DormanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API