Legal Opinion
Carlino v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 24, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*131OPINION OF THE COURT
Jacqueline M. Koshian, J.
Plaintiffs, having sustained personal injuries as a result of a two-car collision, commenced an action against Wesley A. Carr, the operator, with permission, and Michael P. Romeo, the owner of the second vehicle. It is agreed that the Romeo vehicle is substantially at fault for the accident and so far as the plaintiffs are concerned, the insurance policy issued to Romeo by Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company (Kemper Group) hereinafter referred to as Lumbermens, a defendant herein, affords the primary coverage. The plaintiffs in the personal injury…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Allstate InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Sloviaczek v. Estate of PuckettIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Polland v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Clayton v. Alliance Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Sisson v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Di Stasi v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Carlino v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Carlino v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988