Legal Opinion
Castro v. Tri Marine Fish Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 27, 2019No. 17-35703PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion filed on February 27, 2019, and appearing at 916 F.3d 1191, is amended. On page 13, < flouted> is replaced with < appears to have omitted required aspects of>, and < deviated completely> is replaced with < appears to have deviated>. An amended opinion is filed concurrently with this order.
With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App. P. 35.
The petition for panel rehearing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. Sperry Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Zeiler v. DeitschCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Rogers v. Royal Caribbean Cruise LineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jones Day v. Orrick, Herrington & SutcliffeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- BUA International Limited v. Domtec International LLCDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2023
- Danstar Ferment AG v. B&D Nutritional Ingredients, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2026
- Devas Multimedia Private Ltd. v. Antrix Corp. Ltd.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2020
- Progress v. OTL Firearms and Imports CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.