Legal Opinion
Danstar Ferment AG v. B&D Nutritional Ingredients, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided February 27, 2026No. 3:25-cv-02460Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANSTAR FERMENT AG, Case No.: 25-cv-2460-RSH-VET 12 Petitioner, ORDER ON PETITION TO 13 v. CONFIRM FOREIGN ARBITRATION AWARD 14 B&D NUTRITIONAL INGREDIENTS, INC., 15 [ECF No. 1] Respondent. 16 17 18 19 Before the Court is a petition filed by Danstar Ferment AG (“Danstar”) to confirm a 20 foreign arbitration award. ECF No. 1. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court 21 finds the motion presented appropriate for resolution without oral argument. For the 22 reasons below, the Court grants the petition.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Zeiler v. DeitschCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Seneca Insurance Company, Inc. v. Strange Land, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.