Sexton v. Fensterer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
■ Motion by the plaintiff, Lawrence E. Sexton, as trustee, etc., for a new trial upon a case containing exceptions, ordered to be heard at the Appellate Division in the first instance upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the defendants rendered by direction of the court after a trial at the New York Trial Term in February, 1912.
1Opinion of the Court
Ingraham, P. J.:
There was no substantial dispute as to the facts. At the end of the trial both parties moved for the direction of a verdict. The court denied the plaintiff’s motion for the direction of a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and granted a motion directing a verdict for the defendants, to which the plaintiff excepted, and ordered the exceptions to be heard in the first instance by this court.
■ Kessler & Co., the bankrupts, were bankers doing business in the city of New York and the defendants were engaged in business in New York and Germany. • Mr. Gabriel Fensterer, one of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Merchants & Manufacturers' National Bank v. CumingsNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clifford v. West Hartford Creamery Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
- Bank of United States v. SeltzerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
- In Re Canal Bank & Trust Co.'s LiquidationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. MoraldoNew York District Court · 1975
- Greenough v. MunroeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1932