Legal Opinion

Wells v. Huish Detergents, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 24, 2001No. 00-5203PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMON J. KEITH, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Ivan Wells brought this employment action in state court against his former employer, defendantappellee Huish Detergents, Inc. (“Huish” or the “Company”). Huish removed the case to federal court and subsequently filed a motion for summary judgment. The district court granted Huish’s motion, and Wells appeals. Because we find no reversible error, we AFFIRM the district court’s decision granting summary judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

A. Procedural History

Wells, a resident of Kentucky, originally filed his complaint in this employment action…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Tom PIERCE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and Capital Holding Corporation, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  4. Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  5. Craft v. RiceKentucky Supreme Court · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bassett v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2006
  2. Peavey v. University of LouisvilleDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2011
  3. Crump v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2021
  4. Jackson v. Konecranes, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022
  5. Kannapel v. International Business Machines CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API