Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pabst Brewing Co. v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 25, 1986No. 84-716Published

1DissentDykman, J.

The majority concludes that whether a sale of beer is made "within this state" is determined by the residency of the purchaser. The statutory language from which the majority draws *297its conclusion reads: "Sales of tangible personal property are in this state if. . . the property is delivered . . . to a purchaser . . . within this state. . . Section 71.07(2)(c)2, Stats. To reach its conclusion, the majority construes "within this state" to modify "purchaser," and then determines that a purchaser is not within this state if he or she resides outside Wisconsin but comes to Wisconsin to buy beer.

I…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Madison v. Town of FitchburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. De Leeuw v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. American Motors Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Robert Hansen Trucking, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. J.V.R. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API