Alexander's ex'x v. Bradley
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 51 — PETITION EQUITY — APPEAL EEOM MERCER CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— Revised Statutes, sec. 6, art. 4, chap. 47; and sec. 9, art. 4. 18 B. Mon., 864; Driskill vs. Hanks.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Williams
The pi’oceeds of the farm, out of which Mrs. Bradley is entitled to dower" right, after discharging unpaid purchase price, is some four thousand five hundred dollars. She would then be entitled to the use for life of some one thousand five hundred dollars, to be returned to the estate at her decease.
But she preferred to take the cash value of her life estate absolutely, and the court having adjudged to her five hundred and twenty-five dollars, with interest from April 18, 1859, Alexander’s executrix has appealed, and Mrs. Bradley assigns cross-errors.
Mrs. Bradley is proven to have been about…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Ruehl v. Lidgerwood Rural Telephone Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
- Mastin v. Mastin's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Morris v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
- Evans v. Boyle County Board of Sup'rsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- McClain v. McClainCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.